Fed Circuit Watch: Claim Construction in Earlier IPR Bars Review of Same Term in Later IPR

collateral estoppel fed circuit watch IPR patent

Steuben Foods, Inc. did not have a good week at the Federal Circuit.  On March 13, 2018, two decisions were rendered against it in two patent cases, although for different rationales.  The first, Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.,[1] the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that Steuben Foods could not argue …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Patent Troll Thwarts Google’s Assertion of Claim Preclusion

fed circuit watch patent res judicata terminal disclaimer

On March 12, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit delivered a ruling that will stymie Google’s efforts to shake off a pesky serial patent litigator deemed a “patent troll” by the tech press.  That case is SimpleAir, Inc. v. Google LLC.[1]  This is the fourth litigated iteration filed by SimpleAir against Google, …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: PTAB Not Bound by Fed Circuit Precedent

102 112 collateral estoppel fed circuit watch patent Written Description

On March 1, 2018, in a fairly convoluted and highly fractured decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) was not bound to collateral estoppel principles which form a long line of Fed Circuit case precedence.  That case is Knowles Elecs. LLC v. Cirrus Logic, …

Continue Reading

CannabIP: U.S. Patent No. 9,888,703 B2

Cannabis IP patent

U.S. Patent No. 9,888,703 was issued on February 13, 2018, for “Method for Making Coffee Products Containing Cannabis Ingredients,” to Christopher Bhairam.  It is one of the latest issued patents directed to subject matter involving cannabis. The disclosure is directed to methods of making coffee containing doses of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) extracted into the coffee pod.  …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Motion-Tracking Patent Beats Obviousness Finding

103 fed circuit watch motivation to combine obviousness patent

This is the second of a trio of recent Federal Circuit precedential cases that have dealt with the law of obviousness that we will review for this blog.  Here, in Elbit Systems of America, LLC v. Thales Visionix, Inc.,[1] the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that claims directed to a motion-tracking patent …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Still Another §101 Decision Signals Sea Change

101 fed circuit watch patent patent eligible subject matter

On February 14, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down Aatrix Software, Inc. v. Green Shades Software, Inc.,[1] which signals a possible sea change in the §101 patent-eligibility analysis and potentially give patent holders some ammunition to fight invalidation of their patents.  This opinion also tracks the rather complex federal court …

Continue Reading