Fed Circuit Watch: Issue Preclusion Cannot Save Voting Method Patent From §101 Ax

101 collateral estoppel fed circuit watch patent patent eligible subject matter

On April 20, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held in Voter Verified, Inc. v. Election Sys. & Software LLC,[1] that in spite of a favorable prior judicial ruling (although not necessarily on §101 patent subject matter-eligibility), issue preclusion did not apply, and affirmed the patent-ineligibility holding by the district court. The …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: District Court Bungles Inventorship Issue, Holds Federal Circuit

256 fed circuit watch inventorship patent standing

In a blend of jurisdictional and patent formality law, James v. J2 Cloud Services, LLC,[1] deals with the question of whether the inventor retained ownership over a patent so he had standing to sue for correction-of-inventorship under 35 U.S.C. §256. The vehicle used was an agreement, so much of the analysis is an understanding of …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Swearing Behind Must be Supported by Sufficient Evidence

102 fed circuit watch patent pre-AIA swearing behind

On April 17, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held in Apator Miitors ApS v. Kamstrup A/S,[1] that in order for a patent assignee to swear behind a reference by antedating its own conception, it must do so by more than just merely providing the inventor’s statement of conception. The facts are …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Plain Claim Language Not Narrowed Unless Patentee Explicitly Disclaims Scope

BRI fed circuit watch lexicography patent

An interesting study in organic chemistry appeared at the Federal Circuit.  On April 16, 2018, a Fed Circuit panel in Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd. v. Emcure Pharm. Ltd.,[1] held that plain claim language will be construed narrowly absent the patentee’s clear disclaimer limiting its scope. First a primer on stereochemistry, which is the study …

Continue Reading

WesternGeco Damages Case Before SCOTUS in Doubt After Fed Circuit Ruling

damages fed circuit watch IPR patent patent litigation PTAB scotus watch

A recently-issued decision from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may have implications on a pending case before the U.S. Supreme Court.  That case, WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp.,[1] was issued May 7, 2018, and may affect how the Supreme Court rules in a related case involving the same parties and patents …

Continue Reading

SCOTUS Watch: Tech & Privacy Collision Avoided When Microsoft Email Server Case Dismissed as Moot

privacy scotus watch

Normally, this blog is devoted to intellectual property issues specific to technology, much of which is case law analysis primarily in the areas of patent, trademark, and copyright laws.  However, as is often the case in real-life when different laws clash, so do intellectual properties with other areas of law.  The right of privacy is …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Personalized Medicine Method Claim Passes Alice Test for Subject Matter Eligibility

101 fed circuit watch patent patent eligible subject matter

This case, Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Int’l Ltd.,[1] arrived to the appeals court through an unusual, but not uncommon, route: a 35 U.S.C. §271(e)(4)(A) infringement resulting from a 21 U.S.C. §355(j) application, or the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) (aka, generic drug approval process).  However, the other aspect of this case is that …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Knowles Déjà Vu as PTAB Not (Necessarily) Bound to Prior Court Claim Construction

fed circuit watch patent PTAB

In a case of déjà vu, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down Knowles Electronics LLC v. Iancu,[1] on April 6, 2018.  This case bears striking resemblance to an earlier-issued case this term, Knowles Electronics LLC v. Cirrus Logic, Inc., of which the issues were previously discussed on this blog.  The panels …

Continue Reading