CannabIP: Developments in Cannabis Legalization and Effect on IP

Cannabis IP patent trademark

As the new year opens, there have been some developments in legalization of cannabis use, both medicinally and recreationally. First, on the international front, South Korea legalized cannabis for medical use in late 2018.  The South Korean National Assembly passed legislation to amend the Drug Narcotics Act to allow for the sale, import, and export …

Continue Reading

CannabIP: State of Federally-Registered Cannabis Marks

Cannabis IP trademark

As we leave 2018 behind us, there were a number of high-profile states and countries which entered the adult-use cannabis marketplace.  More cannabis companies, formerly illegal, find themselves now legal in the streams of commerce.  However, cannabis product-specific applications for trademarks and service marks remain elusive as the USPTO has maintained a fairly strict examination …

Continue Reading

Government Shutdown Effect on IP Offices

copyright patent trademark

At midnight on Friday, December 21, 2018, the U.S. government entered a partial shutdown, which means all non-essential federal departments will close operations until funding has been appropriated by Congress.  This includes national parks, NASA, and federal agencies.  Those exempt include airports and the U.S. Postal Service, which will continue normal service through Christmas Eve, …

Continue Reading

CannabIP: U.S. Patent No. 10,028,987 B1

Cannabis IP patent trade secrets trademark

U.S. Patent No. 10,028,987 (‘987) issued on July 24, 2018, for “Cannabis-Infused Milk.”  It was issued to inventor Dylan Pillsbury, of Dos Rios, California.  The applicant/assignee is Chocowaska Cooperative, Inc., a cannabis-infused edibles and hemp company.  The claims are directed to a method of preparing and processing milk infused with cannabis, which includes heating the …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Dangers of Pro Se Representation – Failure to Understand Procedural Rules

fed circuit watch likelihood of confusion section 2(d) trademark ttab

On August 27, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a rare trademark ruling, Zheng Cai, dba Tai Chi Green Tea Inc. v. Diamond Hong, Inc.,[1] dealing with the more mundane aspects of proper filing procedures and rules of evidence.  It also served as a reminder of the dangers of USPTO applicants …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: TTAB Fails Genericness Test

descriptiveness fed circuit watch genericism section 2(f) trademark ttab

In a rare review of a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) case, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the decision in Royal Crown Co., Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Co.,[1] involving the doctrine of trademark genericism.  The Fed Circuit panel found fault with the TTAB’s analysis of the test for …

Continue Reading

CannabIP: FDA Approves First Drug with CBD Active Ingredient

Cannabis IP patent trademark

On June 25, 2018, the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) issued a press release in which it approved EPIDIOLEX® for treatment of epilepsy, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and Dravet syndrome.  Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is specific type of epilepsy characterized by multiple seizures and affects intellectual development in children.  Dravet syndrome is a severe form of epilepsy, a …

Continue Reading

CannabIP: Why the USPTO Will Not Register Marks for Cannabis-Related Goods or Services

Cannabis IP trademark

It is perplexing there is still a belief (even among some trademark practitioners) that it is possible to file federal trademark applications at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for cannabis-related goods or services when the likelihood of such registrations is virtually impossible.  The reason is the continued refusal by USPTO, affirmed by the Trademark …

Continue Reading

CannabIP: Clarification on California’s Trademark Regime for Cannabis Goods & Services

Cannabis IP trademark

There have been a few observers, commentators, and practitioners who have been reporting that state trademarks/service marks can be freely registered through the Secretary of State’s office.  This is not accurate.  This post will hopefully clear up the misconceptions surrounding registration of a state trademark or service mark for cannabis-related goods or services. First, legislation …

Continue Reading