SCOTUS Watch: SCOTUS Finds Adding “.com” to “Booking” Makes it a Non-Generic Registrable Mark

distinctiveness genericism scotus watch trademark

In a major ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held in U.S.P.T.O. v. Booking.com B.V.,[1] that an otherwise generic mark used in commerce conveys source-identifying characteristics when used with the “.com” top-level domain (TLD).  In her majority opinion, Justice Ginsburg opined that since only one domain name owner can hold one particular domain name at any …

Continue Reading

Update: USPTO Issues Revised Counsel Rules

trademark

On September 5, 2019, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a revised Examination Guidelines 4-19, “Requirement of U.S.-Licensed Attorney for Foreign-Domiciled Trademark Applicants and Registrants.”  The Exam Guidelines 4-19, originally effective on August 3, 2019, were new formal requirements for trademark applications originating by applicants domiciled outside the United States.  The rules originally required …

Continue Reading

New TM Counsel Rules Creating Problems with Immigration Requirements

trademark

The USPTO promulgated new rules on August 3, 2019, requiring foreign entities applying for a trademark registration to retain U.S.-based counsel for filing and prosecution of the trademark application.  The new rule specifically requires all trademark applicants to retain a U.S.-admitted attorney to handle all trademark matters before the USPTO.  The rule was aimed at …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Fed Circuit Declines to Expand Design Patent Law

design fed circuit watch functionality patent patent exhaustion doctrine right to repair

On July 23, 2019, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit publicly released an intriguing design patent ruling involving design patents covering Ford’s F-150 truck.  In Automotive Body Parts Assn. v. Ford Global Techs., LLC,[1] the Fed Circuit declined to expand trademark law’s functionality doctrine to design patent law, and also declined to create …

Continue Reading