Glyphosate Plaintiff Accepts Reduced Punitive Damages Award

patent Tech Patents technology

On October 26, 2018, the dying plaintiff in the first-of-its-kind case involving Monsanto Co.’s glyphosate product, ROUNDUP®, has accepted a judge’s punitive damages award reduction prior to the court-imposed deadline of December 7, 2018.  The amount of $78 million represents the $39 million for compensatory damages, and the equivalent $39 million for punitives, which the …

Continue Reading

CannabIP: DEA Schedules CBD – but with Big Caveat

Cannabis IP patent technology

On September 27, 2018, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) scheduled EPIDIOLEX® as a Schedule V regulated drug under the Controlled Substance Act (CSA).  In doing so, the DEA has expressly scheduled a drug wholly-containing cannabis compounds as an active ingredient.  Epidiolex was recently approved by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) for market as a …

Continue Reading

Monsanto Motion for New Trial Conditionally Denied and JNOV Denied

Tech Patents technology

As a follow-up to our previous posting on the blockbuster glyphosate trial in which a plaintiff suffering from non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma was awarded $289 million by a San Francisco jury, the judge, on October 22, 2018, has conditionally denied Monsanto’s motion for new trial and denied its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV).  This decision …

Continue Reading

Monsanto Files Motions for Relief After Blockbuster Glyphosate Jury Verdict

patent technology

Monsanto Co. is fighting back against the $289 million jury verdict for its glyphosate product, ROUNDUP®.  On September 19, 2018, Monsanto filed two post-trial motions for relief with the Superior Court of California: motion for new trial and motion notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) in attempts to overturn the verdict against its $6.6 billion product, where …

Continue Reading

Software Removing Metadata Not Enough Showing to “Conceal or Induce” Copyright Infringement

copyright DMCA technology

Technology is meant to make things easier or improve conditions in society.  However, sometimes technology, in the form of software, can sometimes do errant things that can create issues later.  So is the case with Stevens v. CoreLogic, Inc.,[1] decided by the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on June 20, 2018.  The Ninth …

Continue Reading

Second Circuit Will Not Yet Hear Embedded Tweet Appeal

copyright Fair Use technology

In a somewhat unsurprising move, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied an interlocutory appeal (28 U.S.C. §1292) requested by publisher defendants in Heavy, Inc. v. Goldman.[1]  The order can be found here 18-910_goldman-CA2_intapp_dend.  As discussed in an earlier posting on this blog, the district court case, Goldman v. Breitbart News Network, LLC, held …

Continue Reading

IP & Nonhumans: Lessons of Naruto the Monkey on AI

copyright jurisdiction standing technology

A particular copyright case, although not dealing directly with technology, has fingerprints that lead to one area of technology that shares some legal issues with animals: artificial intelligence.  On April 23, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued Naruto v. Slater,[1] in a ruling that was not entirely unexpected since the parties …

Continue Reading

Geoblocking Required to Avoid Copyright Liability, per D.C. Circuit

copyright technology

Geoblocking is the practice of digitally embedding territorial access restrictions into content distributed across the Internet.  At a time when the European Union is legislating anti-geoblocking regulations, it appears the U.S. is going in the opposite direction.  In Spanski Ents., Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A.,[1] on March 2, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the …

Continue Reading

Embedded Tweet Can Be Copyright Infringement, According to NY Court

copyright Fair Use technology

On February 15, 2018, a federal judge sitting in the Southern District of New York issued an opinion that could have profound ramifications for the average Internet user.  In the case, Goldman v. Breitbart News Network LLC,[1] Judge Katherine Forrest ruled that the linking party responsible for a tweet with an embedded photo had committed …

Continue Reading