In the second of two patent decisions handed down by the United States Supreme Court on April 24, 2018, SAS Inst. Inc. v. Iancu[1] was the less visible of the two cases. However, SAS’s close split decision and more practical effect on the patent practice will make it the much more important patent case handed …
Category: IPR
SCOTUS Watch: IPRs Do Not Violate Article III or Seventh Amendment
Article III of the U.S. Constitution states: The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.[1] Also, the Copyright and Patent Clause of the U.S. Constitution states: The Congress shall have power . . …
WesternGeco Damages Case Before SCOTUS in Doubt After Fed Circuit Ruling
A recently-issued decision from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may have implications on a pending case before the U.S. Supreme Court. That case, WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp.,[1] was issued May 7, 2018, and may affect how the Supreme Court rules in a related case involving the same parties and patents …
Fed Circuit Watch: PTAB Obligated to Follow Own Rules
On March 19, 2018, the Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit handed down Dell Inc. v. Acceleron, LLC (and an erratum)[1] In this case, the panel, composed of Judges Moore, Reyna, and Taranto, ruled that the PTAB had to follow its own rules of practice, after it had decided on late-entered arguments that went counter …
Fed Circuit Watch: Well-Prepared Lexicography Dooms Claim Term as Obvious
This, unfortunately, was a bad week for Steuben Foods, Inc., since this is the second case it lost at the Federal Circuit against the same adversary, Nestlé Foods. This time, in Nestle USA, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.,[1] the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, on March 13, 2018, ruled that Steuben Foods could …
Fed Circuit Watch: Claim Construction in Earlier IPR Bars Review of Same Term in Later IPR
Steuben Foods, Inc. did not have a good week at the Federal Circuit. On March 13, 2018, two decisions were rendered against it in two patent cases, although for different rationales. The first, Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.,[1] the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that Steuben Foods could not argue …
No Tribal Sovereign Immunity in IPR
On February 23, 2018, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued a decision denying the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe’s various motions to terminate several inter partes review proceedings based on the theory of tribal sovereign immunity. The consolidated case was Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. v. Saint Regis …
Fed Circuit Watch: Pre-Institution Disclaimer Creates Estoppel for Patent Owner
On January 24, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled on Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.,[1] holding that the patent owner’s pre-IPR-institution statutory disclaimer resulting in an adverse judgment has the effect of estoppel against the patent owner. The facts are as follows. Smith & Nephew filed an IPR against …
Fed Circuit Watch: Time-Bar in IPR Institution Petition is Appealable
One January 8, 2018, the Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit issued Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp.,[1] in which the en banc panel held the PTAB decision to institute or not an inter partes review based on whether the petition was timely can be appealed through judicial review. Specifically, the issue was whether …
SCOTUS Watch: Musings on Oil States
As we await a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court on the constitutionality of IPRs before the PTAB at the USPTO, I reviewed two related points relevant to the underlying discussion in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC.[1] The first is the Oil States’ reliance upon McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. …