Fed Circuit Watch: PTAB Decisions Questioned in Light of SAS and Aqua Products

103 Aqua Products fed circuit watch IPR obviousness patent SAS

On June 19, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued Sirona Dental Systs. GmbH v. Institut Straumann AG.[1]  The case is important because two other recent court decisions – SAS and Aqua Products – affected certain details of this case that ultimately affected how the Fed Circuit ruled.  In SAS, the U.S. …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: No Challenge to Partial Institution Raises No SAS Issue

103 fed circuit watch IPR motivation to combine obviousness patent POSITA

On June 7, 2018, the Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit handed down PGS Geophysical AS v. Iancu,[1] which has a tangential relationship to the WesternGeco LLC, of the recent WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. [2] recently decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.  This case is one of several transition cases pending with the …

Continue Reading

SCOTUS Watch: Supreme Court Vacates CBM Scope Definition

103 AIA CBM obviousness patent PTAB scotus watch

On May 14, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court granted PNC Bank National Assoc.’s petition for writ of certiorari and vacated the Fed Circuit’s ruling limiting the scope of a covered business method (CBM), in PNC Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Secure Axcess, LLC.[1]  The Supreme Court, in its orders, wrote: The petition for writ of certiorari …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: No Overlap Required for Prima Facie Obviousness Between Claimed & Prior Art Ranges

103 fed circuit watch obviousness patent

On March 27, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in In re Brandt, which is just another case in a long line of cases dealing with ranges and obviousness under 35 U.S.C. §103.  The facts are as follows. Gregory A. Brandt and John B. Letts, the application-at-issue’s two inventors, and Firestone …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Well-Prepared Lexicography Dooms Claim Term as Obvious

103 BRI fed circuit watch IPR lexicography patent

This, unfortunately, was a bad week for Steuben Foods, Inc., since this is the second case it lost at the Federal Circuit against the same adversary, Nestlé Foods.  This time, in Nestle USA, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.,[1] the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, on March 13, 2018, ruled that Steuben Foods could …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Motion-Tracking Patent Beats Obviousness Finding

103 fed circuit watch motivation to combine obviousness patent

This is the second of a trio of recent Federal Circuit precedential cases that have dealt with the law of obviousness that we will review for this blog.  Here, in Elbit Systems of America, LLC v. Thales Visionix, Inc.,[1] the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that claims directed to a motion-tracking patent …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Who Let the Cat Out? Faulty USPTO Obviousness Analysis

103 commercial success fed circuit watch motivation to combine obviousness patent

On February 9, 2018, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down Polaris Indus., Inc. v. Arctic Cat, Inc.,[1] where a Fed Circuit panel criticized the invalidation of all 38 claims of Polaris’ patent as obvious under 35 U.S.C. §103 over different combinations of prior art based on the PTAB’s messy §103 analysis. …

Continue Reading