Fed Circuit Watch: Another Mayo, Another §101 Kill

101 fed circuit watch patent patent eligible subject matter

Medical diagnostics patents involving a certain lab testing company named Mayo took a hit when those patents were deemed invalid under 35 U.S.C. §101.  No, it’s not that Mayo case,[1] but the one in which the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently decided on February 6, 2019, Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative …

Continue Reading

TechPat: U.S. Patent No. D835,596 S: MWC Edition

design patent Tech Patents technology

Mobile World Congress opens in Barcelona, Spain, on February 25-28, 2019.  To commemorate the mobile industry’s largest trade show, this blog will showcase various recently issued U.S. patents related to mobile technology. U.S. Patent No. D835,596 S (‘596) issued on December 11, 2018, for “Mobile Phone.”  It was issued to inventors Minsu Cho and Beyoung …

Continue Reading

TechPat: U.S. Patent No. D834,588 S: MWC Edition

design patent Tech Patents

Mobile World Congress opens in Barcelona, Spain, on February 25-28, 2019.  To commemorate the mobile industry’s largest trade show, this blog will showcase various recently issued U.S. patents related to mobile technology. U.S. Patent No. D834,588 S (‘588) issued on November 27, 2018, for “Display Screen with Graphical User Interface for a Prompt Animation.”  It …

Continue Reading

CannabIP: U.S. Patent No. 10,039,740 B2

Cannabis IP patent

U.S. Patent No. 10,039,740 B2 (‘740) issued on August 7, 2018, for “Therapeutic Combinations of Sesquiterpenes and Flavonoids.”  It was issued to inventor Masayoshi Yamaguchi of Shizuoka, Japan.  The applicant/assignee is Primus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of Scottsdale, Arizona, a pharmaceutical company which focuses on nutrition-based drug research. The ‘740 claims are directed to a composition of …

Continue Reading

TechPat: U.S. Patent No. 10,123,538 B2

patent Tech Patents technology

U.S. Patent No. 10,123,538 B2 (‘538), issued on November 13, 2018, for “Glyphosate Salt Herbicidal Composition.”  The inventors are David R. Eaton of Kirkwood, Missouri, Jeffrey A. Graham of Chesterfield, Missouri, and Henry Agbaje of Greensboro, North Carolina.  The applicant and assignee is Monsanto Technology LLC of St. Louis, Missouri, the huge agro- biotech company …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: Single Reference Obviousness Finding Does Not Require Motivation to Combine

103 fed circuit watch IPR motivation to combine patent POSITA

Two cases decided recently by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit discuss the oft-problematic area of 35 U.S.C. §103, or the nonobviousness requirement.  This is the second case, Realtime Data, LLC v. Iancu,[1] decided January 10, 2019. Realtime Data, LLC, owns U.S. Patent No. 6,597,812 (‘812), directed to system and method of providing …

Continue Reading

SCOTUS Watch: On-Sale Bar Still Valid Under AIA

102 AIA on-sale bar patent pre-AIA scotus watch

On January 22, 2019, the United States Supreme Court handed down a highly anticipated ruling that has caused measurable discrepancies amongst the patent community after the America Invents Act (AIA) was enacted.  That ruling, Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.,[1] held that the on-sale bar applies to confidential sales more than one year …

Continue Reading

Fed Circuit Watch: No Error in Reconsideration of Non-Instituted Ground of Unpatentability

103 fed circuit watch IPR obviousness patent

Two cases decided recently by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit discuss the oft-problematic area of 35 U.S.C. §103, or the nonobviousness requirement.  AC Technologies S.A. v. Amazon.com, Inc.,[1] decided on January 9, 2019, is the first case. AC Technologies S.A. owns U.S. Patent No. 7,904,680 (‘680), directed to data access management, in …

Continue Reading